Aston Villa keen on Sonny Perkins

Aston Villa are reportedly keen on signing West Ham forward Sonny Perkins this summer.

The Lowdown: Suarez links

Villa have been hard at work prior to the transfer window officially opening, with permanent deals for Philippe Coutinho, Boubacar Kamara and Diego Carlos already in place.

Steven Gerrard’s side are now exploring a move for Luis Suarez following his release from Atletico Madrid. Gregg Evans has recently added that Villa are ‘still weighing up’ a swoop for the former Liverpool star, and another highly-rated forward is also on the club’s radar.

The Latest: Perkins interest

According to ExWHUemployee, relayed by West Ham Zone, Villa and Leeds are both in the race to sign Perkins.

The 18-year-old is out of contract at the London Stadium at the end of the month and is yet to agree on new terms due to his ‘large wage’ demands. That has led to interest from Villa Park and Elland Road, with a potential compensation move on the cards.

The Verdict: No messing around

Perkins, described as a ‘stand out’ player for the Hammers youth side, seems to be an extremely talented centre-forward. He scored 16 goals in 24 appearances in Premier League 2 and the U18s Premier League, picking up the PL2 Player of the Month award in April.

The teenager also made two senior appearances in the Europa League and one in the Premier League last season, so a cut-price move to the Midlands could turn out to be a smart one in the long run.

Gerrard has already snapped up three huge talents, and adding another alongside an experienced head in Suarez would be a scarcely believable first summer window in charge for the gaffer.

In other news: Villa and NSWE adore ‘astonishing’ next target after Carlos; says ‘deal will happen’. 

Manchester United: Further Frenkie de Jong update emerges

Both Sky Sports reporter Florian Plettenberg and transfer expert Fabrizio Romano have provided an update on Manchester United’s pursuit of Barcelona midfielder Frenkie de Jong.

The Lowdown: De Jong contact

Erik ten Hag has already made a head start when it comes to summer transfer business at Old Trafford, holding a planning meeting in Amsterdam last week.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-man-utd-news-2/” title=”Latest Man Utd news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

He has now terminated his Ajax contract six weeks early in order to get going in England, and a reunion with De Jong seems to be high up on his agenda.

Contact has been made over a possible move and Barcelona’s financial situation may impact where De Jong is playing his football from next season.

The Latest: Updates

Romano took to Twitter on Tuesday, stating that Champions League football is a priority for De Jong next season. He did add that ‘United will try again’ and that Ten Hag would ‘love’ to change the midfielder’s mind over a transfer.

Plettenberg reacted to Romano’s post, believing a move to Old Trafford for De Jong ‘could become one of the biggest transfers in summer’, describing United’s pursuit as ‘hot’.

The Verdict: Marquee addition?

Midfielders will be needed at Old Trafford this summer, with Nemanja Matic set to leave and Paul Pogba, Jesse Lingard and Juan Mata all out of contract at the end of June.

De Jong could prove to be the marquee midfield signing as Barcelona would reportedly want around £85m for his services. Ten Hag would know how to get the best out of him following the pair’s successful relationship at Ajax, however, with Champions League football a priority, a transfer could be complicated.

Plettenberg has stated that it ‘could become one of the biggest transfers’ this summer, so it wouldn’t be a surprise if this dragged on over the coming months.

In other news: ‘Important’ Man Utd arrival now in ‘final stages’ after Ten Hag approves deal. 

Tottenham: Conte expected to recall Kulusevski

Tottenham Hotspur manager Antonio Conte is expected to recall ‘frightening’ talent Dejan Kulusevski for their Champions League clash against Marseille.

The Lowdown: Historic night…

The north Londoners make their first appearance in Europe’s most coveted competition for over two years, coming after their most recent Round of 16 clash against RB Leipzig in 2020.

A lot has changed for the Premier League high-flyers since those two legs with Conte now at the helm and a real sense of optimism at N17.

Spurs have just enjoyed a very productive summer transfer window, completing eight major signings in Ivan Perisic, Fraser Forster, Yves Bissouma, Richarlison, Clement Lenglet, Djed Spence, Destiny Udogie and Cristian Romero on a permanent deal from Atalanta.

Conte will have one eye on Man City at the weekend as they aim to maintain their unbeaten start to the English top flight but this evening’s encounter with Marseille proves equally as important and could help to set the tone of their group campaign.

The Latest: Kulusevski recall expected…

After the Sweden international was replaced by Richarlison in the starting eleven against Fulham last Saturday, Tottenham are now ‘expected’ to recall Kulusevksi for Marseille, according to 90min.

The 22-year-old starlet was rested against Spurs’ last league opponents but could well be handed Conte’s nod tonight alongside the likes of Ivan Perisic and Ben Davies.

The Verdict: Right call…

Conte will want to get off to a flying start to Group D and recalling Kulusevski looks to be the right decision.

He has been a revelation since joining the club from Juventus in January and has been called a ‘frightening talent’ by members of the Italian media (Carlo Garganese).

Conte himself has praised Kulusevski’s application in training, not to mention he has notched an impressive six goals and ten assists in just 26 games for Spurs since putting pen to paper.

Spurs will need to field a strong side tonight regardless of what looms at City and we believe the winger should certainly be on the team sheet.

Delhi Capitals and the madness of youth

Shaw and Pant smashed Sunrisers’ attack on a tough pitch and, after a wobble, an ice-cool Paul finished the job and took the side a step closer to the final

Varun Shetty in Visakhapatnam09-May-2019Delhi Capitals looked like they had done it again. Thrown it away, that is. They needed 12 from 12 with Rishabh Pant and Sherfane Rutherford at the crease. Ten balls on, it was two in two, and Trent Boult had just walked out to join Keemo Paul.Paul usually doesn’t say much, but looked like the one charting out the plans for the last two balls. He is just 21, but had done it before, taken on Khaleel Ahmed in the last over in search for a win. Back in 2016, he had taken West Indies Under-19s to the World Cup title, top-edging an attempted pull. It’s a pull again, and he nails it this time, finishing the job and putting Capitals just one step away from a maiden IPL final.***At the post-match press conference, Prithvi Shaw saw the comic side of yet another close match.”I think we have an affinity for making games interesting every time,” he said. “Things seem to go well and suddenly two-three wickets fall. That is the fun in T20s. As long as the situation is not interesting, you don’t have fun. You don’t feel that pressure. I suppose you guys might have felt the pressure as well – who will win? Who will come for the press conference? The same thing happens in the dugout.”Shaw is one of 12 players who are under 25 years of age in the Capitals’ squad. If we make that under 26, then he’s one of 14 players in that bracket, in a squad of 24. It is no secret now that youth investment is the hill that the Capitals have chosen to die on. It was a decision born when they were still the Daredevils a few years ago. Rarely has a team been able to transform on the fly over 11 years of the IPL. Sunrisers Hyderabad, of course, were born from the ashes of Deccan Chargers and have now carved their identity despite joining the league late. But it’s not something any other team has managed. It’s something that Delhi, especially, had never pulled off, every roster reshuffle over the years had seemed like an exercise in finding new ways to lose.To reiterate, they took the brave call to persist with youngsters, and at long last have come to the possibly their best result ever. And they’ve got it overwhelmingly right.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhen Shaw reached his fifty on Wednesday, only his second of the season, he held up the crest on his shirt, pointed two fingers at the dugout, and traced a line across – dedicated to all of you.”I’ve prepared quite a lot because I wasn’t scoring that well in the Powerplay and the team wasn’t really happy,” he said. “But they never gave up on me. They believed in me and I believed in myself. Thanks to all the support staff, Sourav [Ganguly] sir, Ricky [Ponting] sir, Pravin [Amre] sir, [Mohammad] Kaif sir and the players as well. They’re the ones who have given me a lot of positive vibes, and believing in myself was the biggest thing.”Coming into the Eliminator, Shaw had only one 40-plus score in ten innings in IPL 2019. On Wednesday, Capitals dropped Colin Ingram and brought in Colin Munro – an opener coming in for a middle-order batsman. So, the option was there to bump Munro up the order and drop Shaw altogether. But they persisted with him, and on a surface where top international batsmen like Kane Williamson and Shikhar Dhawan didn’t quite get going, Shaw played all the shots that have made people giddy in his short stint at top-level cricket.Before he had hit his first boundary, he looked to pull twice and was beaten. It wasn’t that kind of pitch – and then he decided it was. Two pulled boundaries, a cut. A punch on the rise to beat mid-off, and a lofted extra-cover drive against Rashid Khan. Just the kind of shots you don’t play on a sticky wicket if you’re a seasoned professional.”I just thought that if I get any loose ball then I’ll wait for it and give it a smash. That’s it.”Give it a smash, that’s it.***Rishabh Pant flays one through the offside•BCCIWhen Williamson took a gamble bringing on Basil Thampi, he said the idea was to take the cutters away from Pant, as opposed to those of Khaleel that come into the left-hander. And Pant, to borrow his team-mate’s words, gave it a smash. That’s it: 4, 6, 4, 6. Game-changer. It’s that thing experts have long said Pant can do.Pant’s 49 off 21 balls was just as breathtaking and ludicrous as Shaw’s 56. In all, he hit five sixes, two of which came against Mohammad Nabi, another bowler who was brought on to counter Pant by taking the ball away. He effectively sealed the win when he hit Bhuvneshwar Kumar over long-off – his first off-side six of the season. Paul then held his nerve to finish the job.Just as often as he is hailed for turning the game on a dime, Pant gets the stick for not being predisposed to see the team through on several occasions. But Capitals just back him to play his shots and come good.”[..] I’m not going to curb the way he plays, I’m not going to tell him to slow down because if he plays his best he will win games for us. I want him to go out with pure freedom and with no other thought other than hitting the ball for a six.”That’s what Ricky Ponting told the press earlier this season, which in hindsight was a preamble to all that happened Wednesday night.There is enough in Capitals’ young roster to produce special moments, and it seems they now have the license to exhibit some of their madness. There were players taking charge of situations at every point. Shaw went after the bowling, Paul looked to steal that single with Amit Mishra at the other end, before owning the situation to seal a win. And Pant, long before he came out to bludgeon Sunrisers, had plastered himself all over the Deepak Hooda run-out situation, screaming, arguing, asserting – convincing his captain not to withdraw the appeal. Hooda wouldn’t even have had strike next ball, but letting it go would have been an extra run in an elimination match.It’s the kind of bottle that’s been on display in the world of football over the last week, a world where successful investments in long-term projects and youth have all come shining to the fore through various underdogs in the Champions League. It is a vastly different world from the two-month fling that is the IPL, but there is a parallel to draw.Before Liverpool overturned their 0-3 score to beat Barcelona in the second leg of the semifinal, manager Jurgen Klopp had said the plan was to either surprise them or “fail in the most beautiful way”. If the second qualifier against Chennai Super Kings is anything like the lop-sided fixture Klopp’s team were entering, then it appears Capitals already have their team talk sorted.

Records galore for Taylor and Williamson

Stats highlights from a run-fest on the third day at the WACA

S Rajesh15-Nov-2015235* Ross Taylor’s score, the highest by a New Zealand batsman in Tests against Australia – he went past Martin Crowe’s 188 at the Gabba in 1985. Kane Williamson’s 166 is the third-highest. Five of the nine highest scores for New Zealand against Australia have been in Perth. Taylor’s current score is also the joint fifth-best by an overseas batsman in Australia.1 Double-centuries scored by an overseas batsman in a Perth Test – Taylor is the first to achieve this feat. The previous-best was 196, by Hashim Amla in 2012. Australian batsmen have scored five double-hundreds in Tests here. This is also the first instance of two double-centuries being scored in a Test match in Perth, and the first instance of three 150-plus scores in a Test in Australia.265 The partnership between Williamson and Taylor, the highest for New Zealand against Australia. The previous-best was also in Perth, in 2001, when Nathan Astle and Adam Parore added 253 for the eighth wicket. It’s New Zealand’s second-highest for the third wicket in all Tests, and the fifth-best for this wicket by any pair against Australia.262 Runs scored by Taylor in ten previous Test innings in Australia, with a highest of 75 and an average of 26.20.105.12 Williamson’s Test average in 2015 – he has scored 841 runs in nine innings, including four hundreds. Among all New Zealand batsmen who have scored 750-plus runs in any calendar year, Williamson’s average is the best.6 Instances of two 250-plus stands in the same Test – David Warner and Usman Khawaja had added 302 in Australia’s first innings. All of these six instances have happened since 2005, and three of those Tests have been in Australia – the other two instances were against India in Sydney in 2012, and against England at the Gabba in 2010.4 Pairs who have put together two or more 250-plus stands for the third wicket*. Before this partnership of 265, Williamson and Taylor had also added 262 against Sri Lanka in Colombo in 2012. The other pairs to achieve this are Hashim Amla-Jacques Kallis (three times), Mahela Jayawardene-Kumar Sangakkara, and Mohammad Yousuf-Younis Khan (twice each).5 Tests in Australia where both teams have topped 500 in their first innings. This is the first such instance at the WACA. Three of those five games have been in Adelaide, and all three in the period between 2003 and 2008.3 Instances of two New Zealand batsmen making 150-plus scores in the same Test innings of an away game (including neutral venues). The two previous instances were in 1972, in Georgetown, and last year in Sharjah. Also, the number of New Zealand batsmen who have more than one Test century in Australia: Martin Crowe, Andrew Jones, and Williamson (two each).1 New Zealand batsman who has scored hundreds in successive Tests against Australia – Williamson is the first. Glenn Turner, though, has scored a century in each innings of a Test against Australia, in Christchurch in 1974.2302 International runs for Williamson in 2015, the highest ever in a calendar year by a New Zealand batsman; the next-best also belongs to Williamson – 1933 in 2014.5030 Test runs for Taylor – he is the fifth New Zealander to top 5000 runs in Tests.38.17 The average runs per wicket in Tests in Australia since the beginning of 2012. Among all countries, it’s second-highest, after the average in Bangladesh (41.29).* Nov 16, 0400GMT: This has been edited to include partnerships for the third wicket only.

Tamim picks patience over panache

The normally aggressive Tamim Iqbal shed his attacking instincts on Monday to score an infectiously boring, but immensely vital half-century for Bangladesh

Devashish Fuloria in Khulna03-Nov-2014Tamim Iqbal used to be a good fielder once. Now, he is one of the slowest movers in the Bangladesh team. Even if some light concession is made for the rigours of seven-year long international career, Tamim’s fitness can be a cause of frustration mainly because he is only 25. While his team-mates spent times at the nets batting and bowling the day before, he was being made to run up and down the pitch in the middle.However, Bangladesh had no reason to complain about the slowness of Tamim’s innings on the first day. The opener shunned his often over-aggressive approach for a remarkably restrained effort, scoring an unbeaten 74 in 250 ball through the day. It may have not been Tamim’s best, but in terms of the time spent and the deliveries faced, it was his longest Test innings and given the year Bangladesh have had, by far his most important one.Yes, it was a first-day batting pitch on which there was zilch for either the seamers or the spinners once the ball got soft, but Bangladesh needed reassurance about their ability to bat long after the near-debacle in the first Test. Before the match, Mushfiqur Rahim had talked about playing for five days and had asked for more from his top order. Once he opted to bat, he wouldn’t have asked for anything more than one full day of boring batsmanship.In that sense, Tamim’s batting was infectiously boring. It engulfed Mominul Haque, who played 101 balls for 35, and Mahmudullah, who was out after scoring a 152-ball 56. But it was the kind of sleep-inducing pill Bangladesh would have been happy to swallow after the Mirpur roller-coaster.Since his consecutive hundreds in England during the summer of 2010, Tamim has gone 33 innings without a century before this Test. Those innings had come two years into his Test career and could have been the stepping stone of a smoother ride in Tests. The last four years have, however, been frustratingly static. And not just for Tamim, but for the team itself. He is one of the best batsmen to come out of Bangladesh and he has known it all along.The problem for Bangladesh was that Tamim through the years has been consistently brilliant in his shot-making and frustratingly inconsistent in hitting high scores. In allowing their opener to feed his naturally aggressive game, the middle order has often had to deal with the loss of their top batsman and the need to build an innings at the same time. There is also the added pressure on individuals to be charismatic, and ambitious like Tamim. For a talented but inexperienced batting line-up, that is too heady a cocktail.So it would have been disconcerting and refreshingly soothing for his team-mates this morning to see Tamim leave and defend. The only fielder in the deep for most part of the first session was the fine leg. There was a packed cordon behind him and only two men in front of square on the off side. Few of Tamim’s drives were cut off by the cover fielder who stood back a few paces but if that irked Tamim, he did not show it. He resisted, and defended, and left the others alone. By lunch he had played out 83 balls for 27. Mominul followed the senior partner, playing out 75 balls.

Tamim’s batting was infectiously boring. It engulfed Mominul Haque, who played 101 balls for 35, and Mahmudullah, who was out after scoring a 152-ball 56. But it was the kind of sleep-inducing pill Bangladesh would have been happy to swallow after the Mirpur roller-coaster.

Tamim lost Mominul after lunch, but didn’t budge from his method. It took him 86 deliveries in the second session to score the 23 he needed for his half-century, his slowest in Tests. Mahmudullah joined in and made an attempt changing the tempo of the innings. That probably helped Tamim stay in his bubble. Towards the latter half of the day, he battled cramps, first in his legs, then in his right hand, but there were no cracks in his concentration.Mahmudullah complimented Tamim’s batting after the game, saying, “He batted very well, played 250 balls today. He might have had reached century if he had played his own game which is aggressive. I think he worked very hard the whole day and batted respecting the behaviour of the pitch.”It was a statement of intent on how Bangladesh were going to approach this Test. For once, scoring runs was not the priority, staying in the middle was. The expectant Khulna crowd waited and waited to let their team know they were there to support them, but for once, the batsmen derived the strength from within. By no means have they turned a corner or taken control of this match, but among the umpteen processes the team often refer to, it could be the one that needs perfecting.Although they did not score many runs, Bangladesh did not lose wickets in clumps. That is immediately better than lots of wickets for not many runs, whatever the run rate. The pitch will break and will provide the necessary excitement, but till then, Bangladesh would hope Tamim and other batsmen continue to spread some boredom.

Dwarfed by the son

From Philip and Alan Sutherland, Australia

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013
Australians do not have a great track record in watching cricket not played by their national team•Getty ImagesIn 1858, the talented allrounder Tom Wills was posed with something of a problem, namely, how to keep his fellow Victorian cricketers fit during the off season. The solution he helped find was the birth of a robust new sport in Australian Rules, said to be something of a mix of rugby, Gaelic football and the similar pastimes involving possum-skin balls of some of the indigenous peoples of the Western District of Victoria.Over a century and a half since, cricket and the sport it helped spawn, Australian Rules, are uneasy bed-mates. Together, they rule the sporting landscape in Australia’s four “southern” states – Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia. Yet, despite sharing grounds they inhabit totally different environs. In 1997, Australia’s regular free-to-air broadcaster of cricket, Channel Nine, had something of a problem too. Its problem was how to keep viewers entertained during the 40-minute Test match lunch breaks. The answer was , a half-hour magazine-style programme hosted by former Australian allrounder, Victoria captain and Australian Rules footballer, Simon O’Donnell. As successful as it has been, however, perhaps will ultimately tell less about the state of the game in Australia than another programme from WIN TV, a Channel Nine affiliate in Victoria – .Of course, has nothing to do with cricket and therein lies the point. There is no country cricket show, nor will there ever be. Footy may have began partly as a means of keeping flannelled fools fit in the winter, but now cricket is more likely to be a way of keeping footballers entertained in the summer. Australia’s pre-eminent farming paper, , tells a similar story. Its sporting section is packed with country football ladders, stories and statistics for six months of the year. This includes a small column which looks at prominent people and families in the country game. When the cricket season comes around, the only bit that is left is this one, small column, now converted to the bat and ball. This different reporting only reflects the different perceptions of football and cricket. The situation is similar in the rugby states of New South Wales and Queensland as well.Football is the realm of club loyalties, whether to Melbourne FC in the AFL or South Sydney FC in the NRL and it is clubs that people are most passionate about. That cricket has survived so well Down Under has more to do with its long history of international rivalry, especially with the Ashes and in more modern times against the West Indies at their peak. How this support will transfer to a local IPL-style 20-over competition is difficult to say. This season of the IPL is not being telecast in Australia. In previous seasons, it’s unlikely to have attracted massive audiences here. Australians do not have a great track record in watching cricket not played by their national team. Only the short stuff of the Big Bash came close. To many Australians, the presence of the likes of Shane Warne in the IPL has probably more curiosity-value than anything else.The coming season is to have two 20-over teams in both Sydney and Melbourne, a radical departure from the strictly state structure that cricket has maintained. Club loyalties in the IPL are reshaping cricket and a similar process is beginning here. We cannot simply blame the IPL, however. Our own attitudes are at least equally responsible for the changes occurring. As a young footballer from the club we support was once reported as saying, “It was nice to be involved (briefly) with cricket again – you forget how much you enjoyed it.” As cricket is dwarfed by its back-sheets son, we forget too that cricket needs space, not just for grounds and deeds, but thoughts as well. When Australians stand at a cricket match and talk footy, do we ever stop to think that the reverse, irrespective of the different time-lengths involved, hardly ever happens.

A report from afar, devoid of practicality

The Pakistan Task Team never actually came to Pakistan, and it shows in their unrealistic report. And what of the original purpose of the team – to help Pakistan deal with losing international cricket? That has been almost completely ignored

Osman Samiuddin06-Jul-2011″Pakistan has been a member of the International Cricket Council,” begins the ICC’s Pakistan Task Team report, “since 1953.” It is an unfortunate way to begin what should be a document of such importance because it is wrong; Pakistan was elected in July 1952 and the team played their first Test later that year in October. In a way – if imperfectly – the error captures something of this report.When the task team was first approved in June 2009 its main purpose was to ensure that Pakistan wouldn’t suffer from the loss of international cricket at home and at least look at ways of resuming it. In fact when it was first offered in February that year, the Lahore attacks that eventually ruled out international cricket in Pakistan hadn’t even occurred. The task team was a response to an unstable couple of years, in which some teams had pulled out of tours and the Champions Trophy (2008) had been taken away on security grounds.It is more than a little strange, then, to see that over 38 pages and through 63 recommendations so little space and thought has been given to this central matter, the very crisis for which the task team was first formed. Only three of the 63 recommendations are actually concerned with reviving cricket and they are not so much recommendations as they are sentences of nothingness. “ICC Members should continue to support PCB through fulfillment of FTP commitments, at neutral venues in circumstances where safety and security remains a concern.” Really? Yes, that is thoughtful.”Where ICC Members are confident following their own risk assessments, they should consider touring Pakistan to honour their FTP commitments.” That’s that sorted then, the first step towards resumption confidently taken. “ICC should support ongoing activity involving the Pakistan ambassadors ([Mike] Brearley and [Greg] Chappell) to keep issues relating to tours involving Pakistan in the public eye.” Eh? Is this even a sentence?Matters of security in Pakistan are not in the hands of the ICC and PCB and there is nothing they can do to change that. But should there not have been more intent, or rather, any intent at all from the PTT? On the ground, what has the task team actually done to try to revive cricket here? Have there been periodic risk assessments by the ICC security task force? Does that force even exist still? Has the PTT even begun to think of a roadmap back, slave as it must be to Pakistan’s internal war, but an important sign of intent nevertheless? Only the delusional expected the PTT to bring back cricket in two years, but even the realist could expect a little more than nothing.That considerable-sized elephant in the room ignored, the rest of the report reads a little like Barack Obama’s first-term report card soon might: noble in intent, divorced from reality. The changes it recommends in governance, in cutting the chairman’s powers, empowering the regional associations and strengthening the hands of selectors are especially fantastic. Have they met Ijaz Butt yet? Does he look like someone who would willingly reduce his own power? Has any PCB chairman ever? And clearly they have little idea of the kind of troubles that ail regional associations if they can cover it all with this beautifully reducedproposal: “Regional bodies should be empowered to manage their affairs and given more say in the decision-making of the PCB itself.”In these places it feels like a report made from afar and in a way it is. The team met a vast number of former players and officials and other stakeholders during its work, but it never came to Pakistan to see and feel how cricket works. There were eight meetings in all but none in the country to which the report pertained.When Zimbabwe was dealing with their own task force a few years ago, there were at least two ICC fact-finding missions to the country. The last one in November 2008 was particularly useful and it led to Zimbabwe accepting the recommendation in April 2009. But the PTT never came to Pakistan to meet, for example, officials from the sports and law ministry or constitutional experts, all of whom have a role in any of the constitutional changes the report recommends.In other places it feels far too intrusive, an indication of confusion as to its own purpose. It suggests better balls be used in domestic cricket. It advises the board to cut the number of central contracts from 45 to 35 (incidentally the board had already cut this down to 20 before the report was published). It urges the board to look again at the value of having regional and departmental teams together in the domestic set-up. Frankly, these points may merit debate, but within the PCB and instigated by them. They are not the concern of the ICC, unless they intend to micro-manage all other Members as well.Nothing in this report, by the way, is binding on the PCB. Implementation already appears a non-starter. The PCB will get back to the ICC with its own “observations” and there will be plenty. So the lasting impression, especially as far as the more expansive recommendations go, will be of a document that most students and well-wishers of Pakistan cricket could have produced. There is much that is right in it, but that is not the point. We all want there to be no nuclear weapons, a world of peace, no corruption, rape, murder or genocide. Not knowing how to get there is the problem.

'Harsh, but he had it coming'

Has the PCB saved cricket from Shoaib or deprived it of him for the next five years?

04-Apr-2008


Is this the end of the long and turbulent road for Shoaib?
© AFP

“Tell me how many players in world cricket have been banned for five years on discipline charges? Previous incidents of indiscipline should have been dealt with at the time instead of being allowed to accumulate.”
“Disappointing is no word to describe Akhtar’s ban, I would call it pathetic and request the new political government to sack the Nasim Ashraf-led PCB.”
“I don’t think the board has done anything wrong by banning Shoaib Akhtar. I am sure the PCB has taken his past record into consideration before banning him … It’s not right on Shoaib’s part to approach the media.”
“Personally, I wouldn’t have banned him. I’d have made him earn his international place back by playing domestic cricket.”
Pakistan coach “The PCB should have supported Akhtar more because there have been characters like Akhtar – there was John McEnroe in tennis and our own Aamer Sohail – who were temperamental yet talented and gave sports a lot to cheer.”
“I can tell you with all honesty that there was no ulterior motive involved in the ban. It was a situation where we had to decide how much longer could we allow Shoaib Akhtar to keep on violating discipline and work ethic.”
“Shoaib shot himself in the foot and there’s nobody else to blame. Something like this was waiting to happen and there’s a very clear sequence to Shoaib’s self-destruction.”
“Just like a child, Shoaib too has a very low tolerance level. He should first think before saying or doing stuff. Shoaib needs to be mature and get married too.”
“I feel sorry for Shoaib, but it is also true he has been involved in many disciplinary cases. However, I would like to add here that it is the result of the PCB’s leniency towards Shoaib’s past blunders. His [latest] offence is not that grave, as several Pakistan Test cricketers in the past have done this type of wrong act repeatedly and got away with it.”
“I think after me now the board has targeted Shoaib Akhtar. Their next targets are Mohammad Yousuf and Shahid Afridi.”
“I think the matter has gone too far. This whole issue is damaging for Pakistan
cricket so I hope that a compromise is reached.”
“His USP is his aggression. All these things keep on happening. We should take things in the right spirit.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus